From The Australian, 13 February 2019, by JANET ALBRECHTSEN:
If Greens leader Richard Di Natale is appalled by bigotry and genuinely believes in tolerance and respect for people of different faiths, he must flush out the anti-Semitism in his party.
.. the [Australian] Greens ...is a party of bigotry at the organisational level, yet no Greens MP is brave or honest enough to expose the hypocrisy. On the one hand, Greens spout sweet-sounding words about morality, compassion and tolerance; on the other hand, the party endorses bigotry.
There are a few good people in the party. Last year, NSW Greens upper house MPs Cate Faehrmann and Justin Field said the party had fallen victim to “extreme-Left ideology”. NSW Greens lower house MP Jamie Parker engages with the Jewish community too.
But even the good people have allowed the NSW party to fall into a habit of bigotry. History warns us that silence emboldens bigots, and that bigotry is a necessary precursor to the sort of political fascism responsible for monstrous crimes against humanity.
We can disagree over Israeli politics and policies, the future of the Middle East peace process, settlements, refugees and much more. We can condemn the actions of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu too. It’s a free country. We get to speak our mind and choose who to associate with. But when a political party treats the members of a religious group as personae non gratae, refusing to meet them or speak with them, that is bigotry.
If the Liberal Party of Australia refused point blank to engage with credible Muslim groups, we would banish its members as bigots.
If the ALP continually rebuffed efforts to engage with Christian groups, we would out its members as bigots.
If the Nationals rejected overtures, over many years, to meet with a community on the basis of its members’ religion, race, sex or sexuality, we would vote them into political irrelevance as extremists.
Yet the Greens have a history of out-and-out organisational bigotry towards the Jewish community in NSW. A few turn up to mark Hanukkah in NSW parliament. But none of them have attended special events arranged by the Jewish community to build tolerance and respect.
Last Friday in Allawah, in Sydney’s south, Jewish leaders arranged a regular Shabbat dinner for different community groups, one of many dinners where people meet, eat and talk to other people from different walks of life.
There was a Shabbat dinner for Liberal Party leaders and members last year and another a few months earlier that included members of the LGBTI community. There was a dinner the year before for Labor politicians, members of Young Labor and union leaders. Another one included many members from the Chinese community and other civic groups. Yet another dinner involved people and groups who help settle new immigrants.
You get the picture. You would be hard-pressed to find more genuinely inclusive events. These are non-political. Yet still the Greens have, for years, refused to be part of these dinners.
At last Friday’s dinner, guests included Labor and Liberal politicians, state and federal, councillors, leaders from the local Anglican church, a leader of the Sikh community, the chairman of Advance Diversity Services, a leader from the Korean community and the president of a local Rotary Club too. But no Greens politician.
In his closing remarks, Vic Alhadeff, who leads the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies and started these dinners, glanced around the room at the broad array of people, thanking them for laying down their arms to be there and on “the degree of stillness which we have collectively achieved in removing ourselves from our frenetic, hectic lives”.
The purpose of the dinners is simple yet important, “engaging as Australians … and using the opportunity to explore our commonalities, beliefs and shared values”.
Not to command agreement or to proselytise. To speak to one another as respectful human beings.
Many Jews might be drawn to genuinely green policies about the environment. Yet the Greens’ extremism towards Jews precludes engagement. That is not tolerance. That is anti-Semitism.
It is hypocrisy of the highest order, given that the Greens readily condemn the bigotry of others. Last year, the party’s federal leader Richard Di Natale slammed senator Fraser Anning for using the language of the Nazis when he referred to a “final solution to the (Muslim) immigration problem”. Di Natale said such language was “vile, racist, bigoted and has no place in our society”. Agreed.
The bigotry of the Greens has no place in Australia either. Sadly, the NSW Young Greens have learned the oldest hatred from their party organisation. A few years ago, they refused to attend a conference held at NSW Parliament House by the Australasian Union of Jewish Students. Labor and Liberal students attended.
There are plenty of reasons not to attend a bolshie student conference, but refusing to speak to or be near Australian Jewish students is anti-Semitism. As the AUJS said at the time, the boycott, under the cloak of the Palestinian problem, reduces all Australian Jewish students to one political issue 12,000km away. Not all Jews share the same views on any issue.
In recent months, neo-Nazi cowards hiding behind the Antipodean Resistance label have posted vile, bigoted and racist posters around Sydney and Melbourne. near schools, synagogues and other buildings.
They are the likely beasts who painted Nazi swastikas on a promenade wall at Sydney’s Bondi Beach at the weekend. Their active recruitment of more bigots is a moral monstrosity.
But let’s not kid ourselves. The organisational bigotry within the Greens is a slyer form of anti-Semitism.
On Holocaust Remembrance Day in April 2017, the NSW Young Greens posted a Venn diagram on Facebook stating that Liberals and Labor love “locking people in concentration camps”.
They’ve learned from their Greens elders to engage in abhorrent Holocaust minimisation, likening offshore processing to determine refugee status to concentration camps where millions of Jews were murdered.
If Di Natale and other Greens are appalled by bigotry and vile, racist behaviour, if they genuinely believe in tolerance and respect for people of different faiths, they need to flush out the anti-Semitism in their party.
Until then, the next time a Greens politician brags about their progressive credentials, remember the organisational bigotry by the Greens towards Australian Jews.
Right now, a vote for the Greens — primary or preference — is a vote for bigotry.
18 February 2019
13 February 2019
From J-Wire, February 14, 2019:
Read on for article
The University of Sydney has dismissed controversial academic Tim Anderson following the suspension of his employment in December.
An employment review panel voted for Anderson’s dismissal by a 2-1 majority. Anderson has announced that he intends to legally challenge his dismissal.Anderson was found to have circulated lecture materials to his students in 2018 which, according to a letter from the Provost and Deputy Vice-Chancellor Stephen Garton, contained an “altered image of the Israeli flag” featuring a “cropped swastika.” The materials were allegedly used in a course on ‘Human Rights and Development’.
The Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-CEO Peter Wertheim commented: “The University did the right thing both in terms of principle and its own interests. Anderson has been an enthusiastic apologist for the regimes in Syria and North Korea which have systematically murdered their own people, while likening Israel, a genuine western democracy, with Nazi Germany. These sorts of statements fall squarely within the working definition of antisemitism adopted by the 31 democratic nations of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA).”
Mr Wertheim noted that the IHRA working definition gives examples that “may serve as illustrations” of antisemitic statements, including:
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
Applying double standards by requiring of Israel a behaviour not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
According to Mr Wertheim, much of the material distributed by Anderson concerning Israel and international affairs amounts to “little more than propaganda”.
“This material has been presented with a gossamer-thin veneer of what passes for‘scholarship’ among the University’s small number of anti-Israel academics, in an attempt to make it seem respectable to the public and impressionable students. Anderson is entitled to his own outlandish views, but he does not have the right to impose them on students, or to compromise the reputation of the University and its wider academic community for maintaining high intellectual standards.”