From The Australian, 30 Dec 2016, by Joe Kelly & Kylar Loussikian:
Foreign Minister Julie Bishop has signalled that Australia likely would have broken with the US and New Zealand by opposing a UN Security Council resolution criticising Israeli settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank.
Her revelation came as former foreign minister Bob Carr declared Donald Trump’s election could empower Israel to seize the West Bank, comments that will stir a growing debate within Labor about its position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Ms Bishop yesterday said the Turnbull government remained “firmly committed to a two-state solution” and indicated that, had Australia been a member of the Security Council, it would not have supported last weekend’s controversial resolution that demanded an end to Israeli settlements in Palestinian territories.
“Australia is not currently a member of the UN Security Council and therefore not eligible to vote on UNSC resolutions,” Ms Bishop said.
“In voting at the UN, the Coalition government has consistently not supported one-sided resolutions targeting Israel.”
New Zealand was one of four countries that co-sponsored the vote. The US, which holds a veto vote in the UN Security Council, abstained.
Earlier, Mr Carr, an influential voice within NSW Labor’s dominant Right faction, said Mr Trump’s election could “unleash (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu to approve a rash of new settlements and even annex the West Bank … that would destroy a two-state solution”.
“If that happened, nobody would be getting up at a (Labor) conference to shield a Trump-Netanyahu axis from the strongest criticism,” Mr Carr said.
His comments come as groundwork is laid for NSW Labor’s conference, due to be held in July, and follow sharp divisions in the US over its abstention from the UN vote.
US Secretary of State John Kerry, in a speech on Wednesday, again rebuked Mr Netanyahu, saying the West Bank was being “broken up into small parcels like a Swiss cheese that can never constitute a real state”.
Mr Carr’s comments follow a visit to Israel last week by Bill Shorten, who met and praised Mr Netanyahu but was criticised for spending only a few hours in the Palestinian territories.
Tensions within the NSW Right, formally known as Centre Unity, are expected to increase over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as policy committees begin to meet in February to discuss motions for the conference. Any toughening of the Right’s stand against Israel would represent a rebuke against the Opposition Leader, who enjoys the support of the faction.
Labor’s position recognises a commitment to a two-state solution, and notes “settlement building by Israel in the occupied territories that may undermine a two-state solution is a roadblock to peace”.
NSW Labor general secretary Kaila Murnain said the party’s position had been “unanimously supported” at the last conference. But that position followed months of negotiations in the NSW Right and Left and the wider party, at times including federal and state players including Deputy Opposition Leader Tanya Plibersek, frontbenchers Tony Burke, Jason Clare and Mark Dreyfus, state health spokesman Walt Secord, and Mr Carr. Those talks would make it more difficult for the party to change its policy again.
Some in the Right have raised concerns about Mr Shorten’s meetings with Israeli politicians, including Mr Netanyahu.State MP Shaoquett Moselmane, linking to a tweet from Mr Shorten’s account praising Mr Netanyahu as “a good friend of Australia”, said the Israeli leader should be tried for human rights violations.
In an email circulating among party members, a former candidate suggests the Queensland Labor Friends of Palestine and its partner body in NSW should work “to entrench the recognition of Palestine as federal Labor policy before the next federal election”. But Acting Opposition Leader Chris Bowen said Labor continued to support a two-state solution.
...................................................for Australian friends of Israel.
30 December 2016
29 December 2016
New Zealand and Foreign Minister McCully should hang their heads in shame
As we end 2016 and celebrate the festival Chanukah, our very own Foreign Minister Murray McCully ...finally got the opportunity to achieve what he has been trying to do since New Zealand was elected to a 2-year term at the UNSC. To get a resolution condemning Israel and trying to force a UN imposed settlement upon her.
New Zealand and Foreign Minister McCully should hang their heads in shame. They have bought into a false narrative, an antisemitic one, that tries to delegitimise the Jewish connection to Jerusalem.
McCully has taken the opportunity of lame-duck President Obama, who has used New Zealand and McCully to score a personal vendetta against Prime Minister Netanyahu. In doing so, McCully has helped Obama to seek his vengeance not just against PM Netanyahu, but against the whole of Israel and the Jewish people.
This resolution is without doubt a biased resolution. It not only rewards the Arab Palestinians with their strategy of continued violence, with continual refusal of all offers of Statehood and peace as long as Israel remains in the equation, but it also adds to the recent UNICEF resolution of ignoring historical Jewish ties to Jerusalem and the Old City. It makes any Jew living in the Jewish Quarter of the Old City an illegal settler. It makes any Jew living and studying at the Hebrew University an illegal settler. It makes all Jewish citizens living in areas that have long been internationally accepted as becoming part of Israel in any peace accord an illegal settler. Illegal that is in the eyes on the United Nations and the anti-Israel lobby!
Let’s be clear. McCully has been obsessed with the settlements for some time. He has time and again stated that the settlements are the main obstacle to peace, yet he refuses to see the facts, and his hypocrisy and double standards make him refuse to acknowledge Arab Palestinian acts of violence aimed at terrorising and killing Israeli Jews as terrorism. This he made clear when speaking to the Jewish and pro-Israel community in Auckland in May 2016.
With respect to the settlements, the 1967 green line was an armistice line never a border. It is a guide to begin negotiations with not a definitive conclusion. Every time the Palestinian leadership has been offered the opportunity for a State they have said no. Why? Because they know that if they say no, they will be rewarded through one of the most antisemitic institutions of them all, the modern-day UN with resolutions such as these. Resolutions which try to delegitimise Jewish historical rights to the land of Israel and to Jerusalem.
Regardless of your views of the settlements, they have never been an obstacle to peace. They add to the complexity, but Israel has time and again shown it is willing to dismantle settlements. McCully has bought into the narrative of settlement expansion, despite settlement activity being it lowest under Prime Minister Netanyahu than any other Prime Minister of Israel since 1967.
And yet one has to wonder why the focus on Israel when across Israel’s northern border we have one the bloodiest civil wars seen in a generation? Another example of where the world has previously said “never again” and then just talks and debates in public arenas such as the UNSC when another genocide, massacre or murderous regime rears its ugly head. Why would the world act together to fulfil the UN’s mandate “save succeeding generations from the scourge of war”, when you can disproportionally focus on Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, the only Jewish State in the world?
McCully’s parting act has allowed himself to become pawn. A pawn to the Obama-Kerry administration that has had nothing more than animosity to Israel and particularly Prime Minister Netanyahu. He has allowed New Zealand to become a puppet in lame duck Obama’s parting blow to Netanyahu, and the Jewish people.
This week the Jewish people in Israel, NZ and around the world celebrate Chanukah, a festival celebrating the Jewish people’s resolve and fight approximately 2000 years ago for Jerusalem. 2000 years on and we still seem to be fighting for our recognised legitimacy. For 19 years (between 1948 and 1967) Jews were forbidden to pray in Jerusalem at the Kotel (Western Wall). Is this the situation that McCully and the Obama administration want to happen again?
To Jews and the pro-Israel community across the world, we apologise for what our Foreign Minister and the government here has done. We are appalled.
Finally, chug Chanukah sameach/ happy Chanukah and merry Christmas to our Christian friends in NZ and around the world.
Am Yisrael Chai.
Responding to Obama’s malicious betrayal of Israel
As predicted, on the eve of his retirement President Barack Obama betrayed Israel. The former long-standing congregant of the paranoid anti-Semitic pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright who has a penchant for supporting to the Moslem Brotherhood, broke with forty years of U.S. bipartisan policy of protecting the Jewish state from the wolves at the United Nations.
His action as a lame duck president was a last ditch effort aimed at undermining his successor’s intended policies, realizing that it is virtually impossible to rescind a Security Council resolution. At the end of his eight years in office he exhibited an unprecedented abuse of power knowing that in his last month he would be unaccountable, despite the fact that his vindictive initiative was totally opposed by Congress, the American people and even by many members of his own party.
European countries represented on the Security Council voted in favor of this abominable resolution 2334 which was essentially drafted and orchestrated by the US and ultimately initiated by New Zealand, a Western country whose foreign policy is largely determined by the extent that it promotes export of lamb. Its co-sponsors were the rogue state of Venezuela, as well as Malaysia and Senegal.
The resolution, passed during the week that Aleppo was conquered by President Assad in the midst of brutal torture and massacres of thousands of innocent civilians, highlights the duplicity and hypocrisy of the United Nations, a body dominated by anti-Israeli and rogue states with democracies groveling in an effort to appease the dominant Muslim nations.
It will serve as an instrument for Israel’s adversaries to further promote boycott, divestment and sanctions and the International Criminal Court will be encouraged to define Israel as a criminal state.
It officially nullifies the disastrous Oslo Accords, negates UN Resolution 242 and repudiates the concept of defensible borders. It paves the way for criminalizing all settlers, including those in the major blocs that will always remain part of Israel and even Jews resident in Jewish neighborhoods of east Jerusalem. It actually defines the Old City of Jerusalem and the Kotel (Western Wall) as occupied Palestinian territory.
In this context the Palestinians will demand that any future negotiations accept these bizarre territorial definitions as opening benchmarks – a status that no Israeli government would ever contemplate accepting. The UN Resolution has effectively negated the concept of direct negotiations, thus ensuring that a peaceful solution to the conflict is more remote than ever.
In this poisonous anti-Israeli international climate, we should not be influenced by the pessimistic prophets of doom in our midst.
We are more powerful today than ever before and in the course of our history we have successfully overcome far greater threats to our existence than the United Nations. Now is a time for us to display unity and strength.
Despite the many initial concerns, we should thank the Almighty that the American people elected Donald Trump as president. Were we now faced with a Clinton Democratic Administration, which in all likelihood would retain Obama’s policies, we would be confronting a real nightmare.
In this context, if the proclaimed decision to move the U.S Embassy to Jerusalem is implemented it will send the world a powerful message. To his credit, Trump used all his weight as an incoming president in efforts to ward off the UN resolution, albeit unsuccessfully. He described the UN “just as a club for people to get together, talk and have a good time” and stressed that after January 20th “things at the UN will be different”. In the wake of his selection of pro-Israeli David Friedman as ambassador to Israel he appointed another pro-Israeli from his team, Jason Greenblatt as his point man for Middle East negotiations. He also demonstratively refused to grant an audience to retiring UN Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon.
In light of these developments most of the mainstream Jewish leadership who were in denial for over eight years should share a deep sense of guilt and shame.
They remained silent as Obama treated Israel diplomatically as a rogue state whilst he groveled to the Ayatollah. They continued voting for him and we now see how he repaid them. The only consistent critic was indefatigable Morton Klein, head of the Zionist Organization of America who has now been more than vindicated.
Individual American Jews are free to express their personal political opinions in any manner they deem fit, but mainstream Jewish organizations are obliged to avoid activity which reflects political bias. The disgusting behavior of liberal mainstream leaders exploiting their positions to promote a partisan bias against Trump, including accusations of anti-Semitism against him and his co-workers before and during the elections, now stands out as being utterly unethical and outrageous.
After the elections the Anti-Defamation League, the religious Conservative and Reform leaders all issued statements conveying their anguish and even mourning the results. Some of these publicly supported the election to the Democratic Party leadership of the Muslim extreme left-wing anti-Israeli congressman Keith Ellison whilst bitterly protesting Trump’s appointment of a pro-Israeli ambassador. Others even protested that moving the US Embassy to Jerusalem would harm the peace process.
The climax was the almost comic but bizarre boycott by major liberal mainstream Jewish organizations of a Hanukah celebration hosted by the Presidents’ Conference at the Azerbaijani Embassy in Washington because it was being held in a Trump-owned hotel.
But now is the time for us to look forward and unite. This U.N. resolution was not just about settlements. It was to undermine the security of the state and pave the way for anti-Semitic boycotts and sanctions by those seeking Israel’s demise.
The resolution employing Obama’s malevolent views made no distinction between isolated outposts and settlements in outlying regions and Jewish suburbs of Jerusalem including the Western Wall.
Any Jew who endorses the view that Judaism’s most sacred site – formerly occupied by the Jordanians who denied Jews access to worship – is occupied territory is reminiscent of medieval “mosers” (informers), who were ostracized from the religious and social life of the community. Those in J Street, The New Israel Fund and other far left Jewish groups who consider Jewish districts of Jerusalem and Judaism’s holiest site to be “occupied territories” should be regarded as renegades and treated as such.
The immediate challenge is to encourage the incoming Trump administration to salvage what it can from Obama’s betrayal of Israel.
There are grounds for hoping that when the extremism of this resolution is fully comprehended some countries will have a change of heart. Besides, if current trends prevail, many European countries will follow the pattern of America and elect governments which will be far more pro-Israel than those appeasing the Muslims.
But above all, we must be optimistic that if President Trump will stand by his recent statements, Israel may enjoy the closest relationship it has ever had with the United States – which could more than compensate for the UN whose rogue actions have encouraged Trump to display open contempt. This is relevant when taking into account that the US funds 25% of the UN budget.
Most important to note is that the moderate Sunni countries of Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states will be desperate to ally themselves with Trump and are hardly likely to do more than express formal protests if and when the US treats Israel as a genuine ally.
But for this to be effective, Israel must tread cautiously and not provoke the incoming administration by seeking to impose arrangements without prior consultation.
Naftali Bennett and other right-wing elements should be silenced and Prime Minister Netanyahu must be enabled to determine the attitude of the new administration. They should also realize that whilst there is close to a consensus for ultimately annexing the settlement blocs and creating defensible borders, most Israelis do not seek to incorporate Judea and Samaria in their entirety because this would effectively lead to the demise of a Jewish state and its substitution by a binational state which would be swallowed up by the Arab world.
The recent statements and settlement policies certainly provided Obama with additional ammunition to justify his perfidious initiative. But it is almost certain that he would have acted no differently had the government not been engaged in any public discussion because his prime intent, since the day of his inauguration, has consistently been to impose such a settlement on Israel.
The reality is that all political parties – other than the Joint Arab list and Meretz – are no less opposed to this resolution than the government. This is surely a time for all political parties to set aside parochial squabbles and act in the national interest by displaying strength and unity.
This will not be the first time that we overcame major challenges and subsequently emerged stronger than ever.
Despite this despicable UN resolution, the new Trump Administration could lead to major changes in the global arena which may have dramatic positive repercussions for Israel and so gives us cause to be confident and optimistic.
23 December 2016
Israel-basher and fake journalist may be forced to leave Israel
From JPost, 19 Dec 2016, by GIL HOFFMAN:
A journalist who has allegedly engaged in activity supportive of the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions movement may not be able to remain in Israel, the Government Press Office told The Jerusalem Post exclusively on Sunday.
GPO director Nitzan Chen said he was leaning against renewing the press card of Antony Loewenstein... If the card is not renewed when it expires in March, the Interior Ministry will not allow him to remain in Israel.
“We are leaning toward recommending that his work permit not be renewed due to suspected BDS activity,” Chen said. “We are checking the incident because unfortunately, the journalist did not give enough information to our staff. We will learn to check better so there won’t be such incidents in the future.
...Loewenstein noticeably directed what was seen as a hostile question toward Yesh Atid leader Yair Lapid at an FPA event last Monday.
“Is there not a deluded idea here that many Israeli politicians, including yourself, continue to believe that one can talk to the world about democracy, freedom and human rights while denying that to millions of Palestinians, and will there not come a time soon, in a year, five years, 10 years, when you and other politicians will be treated like South African politicians during Apartheid?” he asked.
After the Post wrote about the event, Honest Reporting managing editor Simon Plosker investigated Loewenstein.
“He is a prominent anti-Israel activist in his native Australia and a public supporter of the BDS movement,” Plosker wrote. “His own blog includes a post titled Personally supporting BDS against Israel where he published a statement that he made at a BDS event in Sydney in 2014.”
...The Guardian distanced itself from Loewenstein. Its Jerusalem correspondent, Peter Beaumont, said he knew nothing about him. The Guardian’s head of international news, Jamie Wilson, said Loewenstein was contracted to write comment pieces for Guardian Australia and remains an occasional comment contributor but he “is not a news correspondent for the Guardian in Israel.”
According to Honest Reporting, Loewenstein was told by the Guardian not to reference the publication at future press conferences unless he is working on a direct commission.
Lapid praised the GPO’s move.
“Freedom of speech and freedom of the media are key in a democracy likes ours, but that doesn’t extend to BDS activists pretending to be journalists,” he said. “It harms Israel and it harms the media. This is another example of the lies of the BDS movement. We have a duty to protect ourselves from people who seek to demonize and delegitimize the State of Israel.”
The TRUCK did it!!
From "Steyn on the World", December 19, 2016, by Mark Steyn:
The following column appears in Australia's Herald Sun:
On Saturday morning, I recalled a conversation over the summer with a German lady who had "found herself on the receiving end of some vibrant multicultural outreach from one of Mutti Merkel's boy charmers":
As a result, she no longer goes out after dark. She had also decided - with reluctance, because she enjoyed it - to cancel her participation in a local Christmas market, where she'd sung carols every year - in broad daylight.And I concluded:
"Why would you do that?" I asked.
"Because it's Christmas," she said, "and I'm worried Christmas will be a target."
Christmas markets are a grand German tradition, but probably not for much longer.Forty-eight hours later, twelve people are dead and 48 are injured (at the time of writing) because they attended a Christmas market at Breitscheidplatz in Berlin. This BBC headline effortlessly conveys the madness of our times:
Lorry kills 12 at Christmas marketAh, so the truck did it. So it's nothing that can't be fixed by some basic truck-control measures - like, say, licensing and registration of trucks.
Within moments, the familiar rituals of this latest vehicular misfortune emerged: "It was definitely deliberate," said one intended victim. And as CNN reported:
Witnesses told police the attacker had shouted out...Go on, take a wild guess!
...'Allahu akbar' and 'Infidels must die' as he carried out the attacks.The less obviously evasive responses were almost as dispiriting. An English tourist visiting from Birmingham complained that in his native city ugly bollards line the sidewalks to obstruct any similarly homicidal lorries in the vicinity. The Christkindlmarkt is a German tradition dating back to the Middle Ages: Munich's is over 700 years old. A society that can only hold three-quarters-of-a-millennium-old traditions behind an impenetrable security perimeter is a society that will soon lose those traditions.
My own preference, as I've stated, is that, if free countries have to have unsightly security controls, why don't they have them around the national borders rather than around every single thing inside those borders?
"I think this is insane when I listen to people say 'oh, we're now going to have to have metal detectors in night clubs, security in nightclubs. Ok, so what happens next? They blow up a bakery, they blow up a little pastry shop, so then you're gonna have to have metal detectors to get into the pastry shop?"
"Instead of having all these individual perimeters around every Dunkin Donuts franchise or every gas station, or ever J.C. Penny, why not have just one big perimeter around the country?" Steyn concluded. "We could call it a border! And we could have, like, border security!"But that's just crazy talk. On Fox News' top-rated Kelly File, Martha MacCallum asked two experts about the market slaughter and both of them instantly pivoted to military strikes against ISIS, the need to form an Arab version of NATO, and other grand schemes.
I'm all in favor of destroying ISIS, but ISIS is a mere symptom, not a cause. After ISIS is destroyed, it'll be something else. In many parts of the world, it's already something else: al-Qa'eda, the Taliban, Boko Haram, Abu Sayyaf, al-Shabaab, al-Nusra, al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya, al-this, al-that, al-the other...
Neither of Martha's guests so much as raised the question of why people who want to murder you for attending a Christmas market are in your country in the first place.
But relax! As Australia's Malcolm Turnbull assured us a couple of atrocities back, it is "a very, very small percentage" of the Muslim community who are "violent extremists". Like other western leaders, he never actually tells us what percentage it is - one per cent, point-one, point-oh-oh-oh-one - but I'm sure he knows, or he wouldn't say it so breezily, would he?
And at least our leaders are agreed that it is a percentage. A percentage is a very simple concept: If it's 0.001 per cent of the Muslim community that are "violent extremists" and you have 100,000 Muslims, then, yes, it's "a very, very small percentage". If you then admit another 100,000 Muslims, then you've just doubled the number of "violent extremists". And, whether you keep on doing that year in year out or just cut to the chase and import (as Angela Merkel did) a million and a half in one fell swoop, then, regardless of whether the percentage is stable, you are importing more and more people who want to kill your own citizens.
Why? What's the benefit? And why do people like that Birmingham tourist think the answer to more and more Muslims is more and more bollards? I spent most of the last year in France and other parts of Western Europe and there are soldiers everywhere - outside churches, post offices, railway stations, shopping malls, Jewish schools initially and now non-Jewish schools, topless beaches and Christmas markets... And it's not enough, and it can never be enough. And, even if it was, who wants to live like that?
Just a few hours before twelve German families had a big bloody hole blown through them a week before Christmas, my old friend and sometime warm-up act Jonathan Kay, with his usual impeccable timing, decided to have another sneer at those simpletons who fret about where all this is heading:
Great @CBC180 discussion. Due to Mark Steyn-esque hysteria, Canadians think Canada is 17% Muslim. It's actually 3%.Ha! What rubes, eh? You hick Aussies are no better: According to the same poll, you reckon Australia's 12 per cent Muslim; it's actually 2.4 per cent. So what's the big deal?
As flattering as it is to be blamed for an entire nation's Islamophobia, I'd say the reason Canadians and Australians - like the French and Germans and Belgians and almost everybody else - think there are more Muslims than there are is fairly obvious: Islam punches above its weight. Even on days when they're not mowing down Christmas shoppers and assassinating Russian ambassadors - or stabbing French priests, or blowing up Belgian airports, or sexually assaulting German New Year revelers, or storming Sydney coffee shops - the less incendiary news of Islam in the west nevertheless conveys an assertiveness and confidence that would still be impressive even if it were 17 per cent. By the time it actually is 17 per cent, you'll think it's 48.
Since we seem to have wound up obsessing on percentages, I suppose twelve dead Germans is likewise an insignificant percentage, and far too trivial to sophisticates to warrant "Mark Steyn-esque hysteria". But it is December 20th, and for the victims' families in five days' time that will be 100 per cent of their children or parents or boyfriends or girlfriends missing at the Christmas table. Say a prayer for them: They died because of the recklessness of a western political class that has doubled down on a mad long-shot sociopolitical experiment that can only end catastrophically.
~from The Herald Sun of Melbourne
An open letter to Australian Labor "Friends of Palestine"
From Luke Walladge, a (very) active and leading member of the Australian Labor Party:
Dear Labor Friends of Palestine,
As a long-time supporter of Israel, inside and outside the ALP, I received your recent pamphlet with some disquiet. But having read it closely I must admit to having been wrong, entirely wrong, and I feel I must now make amends for my errors.
You see, I had always assumed the supporters of the Palestinian cause to be well-intentioned (if misguided) social democrats and left-wingers who confused poverty and disadvantage with moral righteousness. A bit like those trade unionists at United Voice who preface every policy speech with "we represent the lowest paid workers in Australia" as if that were cause for pride instead of shame. I assumed most pro-Palestinian people bought a simplistic and error-riddled narrative about Israeli oppression and heroic resistance and just wanted to Do The Right Thing.
But I was wrong. And I will make amends.
Your recent tract "So You're Going To Israeli" is such a vile, fraudulent, racist, biased piece of propaganda that it can only be indicative of something much darker, much older, much more sinister. To be so knowingly and repetitively wrong, to blatantly misrepresent the truth so often, to use such anti-Jewish tropes so cavalierly can only result from a deep well of our civilisation oldest prejudice.
You are a pack of anti-Semites. And you should be ashamed, and I was wrong about you, and I'm going to make amends.
You are not Friends of Palestine. You are enemies of Israel and and you are enemies of Israel because you have given in to anti-Semitism.
If you were Friends of Palestine you would ask why, despite receiving more international aid per head than any other people group on earth, Arabs living in the West Bank and Gaza are destitute while their leadership flies Lear jets and live in Paris mansions. You would ask Egypt why they have built a wall between that country and Gaza, through nothing passes - instead of asking why Israel has checkpoints and naval searches of cargo through which all legitimate goods may pass. You would ask why the Palestinian leadership holds no elections for its people, why they place rocket launchers in their houses and their schools and their hospitals to create human shields for civilian-killing weaponry, why they inculcate innocent children into philosophies of hate and death that produce suicide bombers and knife attackers.
But you are not Friends of Palestine. You are, instead, friends of those who enslave and oppress and misguide and exploit the Palestinian people. You are Friends of terrorists. You are Friends of those who's goal is not the liberation of Palestinians but the extinction of Jews. And you are enemies of Israel and blame all the ills of the region on the only Jewish state in the world.
You use the Israeli Prime Minister's Hebrew name, Binjamin, in an attempt to make him seem less normal, and, well, Jewish.
You say that Jewish organisations will not fund trips to places like Hebron and Bethlehem when in fact they do, they really do, I have been there and you are lying.
You misquote people and torture data in your booklet to distort the situation in the Middle East and hold the Jewish state responsible.
You use anti-Semitic tropes of rich Jews and shadowy Jewish organisations to create an image of deception around visiting Israel.
You lie, lie and lie again, so often and so cunningly and so blatantly that it cannot be an accident, it can only be your intent.
So from now on I will not be misled about your organisation and its goals any longer. I will make amends for my previous errors by resisting you to the absolute fullest extent of my capacities.
This is an open letter; unlike your organisation I hide neither my motives, nor my methods, nor my associations. I sign my letters while you publish your blogs and your pamphlets and your propaganda anonymously.
I am ashamed to share membership of the same Party as you.
But I will not allow you to poison the wells of the last, best hope of social democracy in this nation with your racist, anti-Semitic stench.
I was wrong. But I'm not wrong any more.
You are.
Luke Walladge
[Luke Walladge is a former Senate staffer, and currently runs his own political consultancy.]
Dear Labor Friends of Palestine,
As a long-time supporter of Israel, inside and outside the ALP, I received your recent pamphlet with some disquiet. But having read it closely I must admit to having been wrong, entirely wrong, and I feel I must now make amends for my errors.
You see, I had always assumed the supporters of the Palestinian cause to be well-intentioned (if misguided) social democrats and left-wingers who confused poverty and disadvantage with moral righteousness. A bit like those trade unionists at United Voice who preface every policy speech with "we represent the lowest paid workers in Australia" as if that were cause for pride instead of shame. I assumed most pro-Palestinian people bought a simplistic and error-riddled narrative about Israeli oppression and heroic resistance and just wanted to Do The Right Thing.
But I was wrong. And I will make amends.
Your recent tract "So You're Going To Israeli" is such a vile, fraudulent, racist, biased piece of propaganda that it can only be indicative of something much darker, much older, much more sinister. To be so knowingly and repetitively wrong, to blatantly misrepresent the truth so often, to use such anti-Jewish tropes so cavalierly can only result from a deep well of our civilisation oldest prejudice.
You are a pack of anti-Semites. And you should be ashamed, and I was wrong about you, and I'm going to make amends.
You are not Friends of Palestine. You are enemies of Israel and and you are enemies of Israel because you have given in to anti-Semitism.
If you were Friends of Palestine you would ask why, despite receiving more international aid per head than any other people group on earth, Arabs living in the West Bank and Gaza are destitute while their leadership flies Lear jets and live in Paris mansions. You would ask Egypt why they have built a wall between that country and Gaza, through nothing passes - instead of asking why Israel has checkpoints and naval searches of cargo through which all legitimate goods may pass. You would ask why the Palestinian leadership holds no elections for its people, why they place rocket launchers in their houses and their schools and their hospitals to create human shields for civilian-killing weaponry, why they inculcate innocent children into philosophies of hate and death that produce suicide bombers and knife attackers.
But you are not Friends of Palestine. You are, instead, friends of those who enslave and oppress and misguide and exploit the Palestinian people. You are Friends of terrorists. You are Friends of those who's goal is not the liberation of Palestinians but the extinction of Jews. And you are enemies of Israel and blame all the ills of the region on the only Jewish state in the world.
You use the Israeli Prime Minister's Hebrew name, Binjamin, in an attempt to make him seem less normal, and, well, Jewish.
You say that Jewish organisations will not fund trips to places like Hebron and Bethlehem when in fact they do, they really do, I have been there and you are lying.
You misquote people and torture data in your booklet to distort the situation in the Middle East and hold the Jewish state responsible.
You use anti-Semitic tropes of rich Jews and shadowy Jewish organisations to create an image of deception around visiting Israel.
You lie, lie and lie again, so often and so cunningly and so blatantly that it cannot be an accident, it can only be your intent.
So from now on I will not be misled about your organisation and its goals any longer. I will make amends for my previous errors by resisting you to the absolute fullest extent of my capacities.
This is an open letter; unlike your organisation I hide neither my motives, nor my methods, nor my associations. I sign my letters while you publish your blogs and your pamphlets and your propaganda anonymously.
I am ashamed to share membership of the same Party as you.
But I will not allow you to poison the wells of the last, best hope of social democracy in this nation with your racist, anti-Semitic stench.
I was wrong. But I'm not wrong any more.
You are.
Luke Walladge
[Luke Walladge is a former Senate staffer, and currently runs his own political consultancy.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)